Our Obsession With Cheap Clothes Is Keeping the Petrochemical Industry Alive

Our relationship with the clothes we wear is built entirely on a tactile illusion. When we touch a fabric, our minds conjure images of cotton fields, traditional looms, or natural fibers. Yet the physical reality of modern wardrobes begins far from agriculture, rooted instead in oil refineries and natural gas processing plants. According to the comprehensive Fossil Fashion report published by the Changing Markets Foundation, over two thirds (69 percent) of the raw materials used in global clothing production today consist of synthetic fibers derived directly from fossil fuels like crude oil and natural gas.

Fabrics that touch our skin, such as nylon, acrylic, elastane, and polyester, are actually heavily processed petrochemical products. In manufacturing plants, plastic polymer granules are melted and drawn through microscopic holes to be transformed into very fine and long filaments. These plastic strands are then spun together to create yarn ready for weaving. Today, polyester, which is found in more than half (56 percent) of all textiles produced globally, is manufactured from the exact same raw material as plastic water bottles, namely polyethylene terephthalate (PET), a derivative of crude oil and natural gas. In short, the modern textile industry currently ranks as the third largest user of plastic in the world, consuming 15 percent of global plastic production alone, trailing only behind the packaging and construction sectors.

The Moment Chemistry Took Over Agriculture

The millennia old natural cycle of textile history shifted course with a rupture experienced in chemistry laboratories during the mid twentieth century. The introduction of nylon, the first fully synthetic fiber, in 1940 was followed just a year later by the patenting of PET polyester by British chemists John Rex Whinfield and James Tennant Dickson. Over the subsequent half century, the production of fossil fuel based fibers grew at twice the rate of overall textile production, expanding ninefold and surpassing cotton in the early 2000s to become the most in demand material in the world.

Behind polyester seizing the global market lies not an aesthetic preference but the strict mathematics of cost. The production cost per kilogram of polyester, which possesses a wrinkle resistant and quick drying structure, equals approximately half that of cotton. This sharp drop in raw material costs dismantled the traditional concepts of spring and winter seasons in the textile world, giving birth to the fast fashion model that allows brands to release 50 to 100 micro seasons a year.

The abundance of cheap plastic fibers and the devaluation of garments advanced as two mutually reinforcing elements. Consumers buy 60 percent more clothing compared to the early 2000s while keeping each item for half as long. Industry analyses indicate that the lowest priced garments are treated almost like disposable products, discarded after being worn only seven or eight times.

The New Lifeline of the Fossil Fuel Industry

The fast fashion quest for cheap clothing has turned the textile sector into one of the most strategic partners of fossil fuel extraction. Approximately 350 million barrels of oil are consumed every year merely to produce the plastic based fibers in our clothes. The energy spent by the sector for synthetic fiber production corresponds to 1.35 percent of global oil consumption, a volume that surpasses the annual national oil consumption of Spain.

This picture is part of a much larger transformation in global energy politics. As the demand for oil decreases alongside the decarbonization efforts of the energy and transportation sectors, the oil and natural gas industry is investing in plastic and synthetic fiber production as its primary future revenue stream. The International Energy Agency (IEA) projects that petrochemicals will account for 50 percent of the growth in global oil demand by 2050. If the current rate of production remains unchanged, it is estimated that by 2030, more than 73 percent of total global fiber production will be derived from fossil fuels. Furthermore, this production is increasingly shifting toward dirtier sources. The raw material for synthetic yarn is no longer obtained solely from crude oil but also from shale gas extracted via fracking, which releases intense methane gas into the atmosphere, and even directly from coal.

While the production of a single synthetic shirt creates a carbon footprint of 5.5 kilograms, this amount remains at 2.1 kilograms for a cotton shirt. According to data from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, the total carbon dioxide emissions of synthetic garments are six times higher than those of cotton. Despite this, certain sustainability indices within the fashion industry scored polyester as a more eco friendly material than natural fibers like cotton, wool, and silk for years. The fundamental reason for this illusion is that the indices in question measure the environmental impact of a fabric only from production to the store shelf (cradle to gate), completely excluding the massive plastic pollution created during the stages when the garment is washed, used, and discarded. In response to this narrative where natural fibers are criticized over water consumption, a scientific study conducted by the Water Footprint Network reveals the hidden water cost of synthetic production with these exact words:

"The water footprint of polyester can be as high as 71,000 cubic metres per tonne of fibre, compared to 10,000 cubic metres per tonne for cotton."

The Plastic Bottle Illusion and Obroni Wawu

The recycling narrative offered by the fashion industry against this massive production collides with physical limits. Today, 87 percent of all materials in the global clothing system are lost at the end of their use by being buried in landfills, incinerated, or through production losses. The true recycling rate where clothes are turned back into clothes (fibre to fibre) remains well below 1 percent.

Almost all of the recycled polyester garments we frequently encounter on store labels are produced not from old clothes but from used PET water bottles. However, diverting PET bottles, which could be recycled back into bottles countless times in a closed loop with clean collection systems, to the textile sector does not create a circular economy. On the contrary, it places this plastic, which becomes impossible to recycle again once blended with cotton or wool, on a one way street destined for landfills or incinerators at the end of its useful life.

While 73 percent of produced garments go directly to landfills or incineration plants, approximately one garbage truck full of textiles is abandoned to nature every single second worldwide. A non biodegradable polyester garment can remain in landfills for more than 200 years, leaching toxic chemicals into the soil and groundwater.

The most concrete proof that discarded clothes do not simply vanish is seen in the global second hand trade. A vast majority of the garments collected in high income countries are not donated for free but sold to the Global South at prices ranging from 400 to 1,000 euros per ton. Kantamanto Market in Ghana, one of the largest second hand markets in West Africa, receives 15 million pieces of clothing every week. Research by The OR Foundation examining this flow, which the locals call Obroni Wawu (Dead White Man's Clothes), documents that 40 percent of the garments in the arriving bales are separated as trash at the very first moment due to being excessively poor in quality and worn out, eventually being dumped into rivers and washing up on shores with ocean waves.

From the Washing Machine to the Human Placenta

The material memory left behind by fossil fashion does not consist solely of fabric piles on West African beaches. A synthetic garment does not need to be thrown in the trash to pollute nature. These fabrics shed invisible microplastic fibers every moment they are worn and washed.

A single laundry wash cycle leaves an average of 9 million microscopic plastic fibers in wastewater systems, and treatment plants can capture less than half of these particles. The half a million tons of microfibers filtering from washing machines and mixing into the oceans each year equal the weight of more than 50 billion plastic bottles. This invisible current has spread across such a vast geography that a study conducted in Arctic waters revealed that more than 73 percent of the microfiber pollution in the region consisted of polyester fibers resembling the PET used in textiles.

Carrying harmful chemicals such as flame retardants and plasticizers, these microscopic strands return from ocean ecosystems into the food chain and from there directly into the human body. Studies show that microfibers are present in more than 80 percent of tap water, in table salt, and in the air we breathe. Humans inhale 13,000 to 68,000 plastic microfibers annually just from shedding off their own clothes, carpets, and home textiles. The fact that scientists have even detected microplastics in the placentas of unborn babies through the Plasticenta research proves that the synthetic texture in our wardrobes has long crossed our biological boundaries.

An industry that extracts carbon reserves formed underground over millions of years to transform them into cheap fabrics to be worn only a few times does not actually consume anything. By merely changing the form of matter, it takes it from underground and distributes it to ocean currents, polar glaciers, and our very own cells. While the primary raw material of the clothes we carry on us relies on oil wells and the invisible fibers they shed infiltrate the biology of unborn generations, how much longer can we continue to view fashion as an aesthetic realm independent of the ecological realities of the planet?

— Related Reading: The Real Weight of Our So-Called Virtual World